The Lowdown
What's Going On In Cumberland County And Beyond
What's Going On In Cumberland County And Beyond
Aug 24th
No, I have not fallen off the face of the earth.
And, while I may have fallen off the Lower Allen radar lately, that shouldn’t give anybody the impression that I no longer care about what is going on in the township, or, of course, don’t have something to say about it.
So we have first things first, I took myself out to the latest Lower Allen Township BOC (Board of Commissioners) meeting last evening. The meeting began at 7:30 after a 7 p.m. public hearing on a text amendment to the current zoning ordinances. Never mind that the public hearing lasted all of about three minutes, and consisted solely of the BOC approving a continuance to Sept. 27; the hearing happened all the same.
The ordinance is, for me, a cause of some concern, but one which deserves more study before I go off half cocked. For now, you need to know that a change has been proposed to the current Conservation Subdivision Overlay District. The next time the matter is planned to be discussed in public is at the Sept. 21 meeting of the Planning Commission, so I have a couple days to get my facts straight.
Then, why this post? Why even bother updating the blog to announce that an update will be forthcoming?
Good question.
First, you my have noticed an Events page listed in the menu bar at the top of the page. I’ve added a calendar to the site, and will endeavor to provide you with some pertinent dates and information about upcoming happenings in Lower Allen and its immediate surroundings.
Second, we alway learn something at the LAT BOC meetings. Last night, we learned that:
More updates coming soon, especially about Ordinance 2010-05.
Promise.
Jul 15th
Our friends at Lower Allen Township have scheduled a meeting at The Barn on Wednesday, July 28 to discuss a gateway sign for the Village of Lisburn.
In the Village of Lisburn Neighborhood Plan approved in 2009 by the LAT Board of Commissioners, a erecting and maintaining gateway sign was one of thirteen recommended actions which could be taken to preserve and protect the unique area.
The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. See you there.
Jul 15th
Given the tenor and volume of comments over on PennLive in the last couple of days, I can’t wait to see what bubbles up here.
Regardless, in case you haven’t heard yet, Pennsylvania American Water Company has now added chloramines to the water it is serving to more than 30,000 customers on the west shore. That means that, in a couple of days, most readers of The Lowdown will be consuming, cooking with, and bathing in chloramines.
I won’t rehash all the points made previously; you can peruse them at your leisure.
What is important now is that, if you have an aquarium or are a liver dialysis patient, you need to take a few precautions. From the EPA:
Chlorine and monochloramine must be removed prior to use in kidney dialysis machines.
Chlorine and chloramines or must be removed from water used in dialysis machines because this water comes into direct contact with blood.
• Dialysis patients should consult with their physicians if they have concerns about using chlorinated or chloraminated water.
• Dialysis patients can safely drink chlorinated or chloraminated water.2
Chlorine and monochloramine must be neutralized or removed if used in aquariums.
• Chlorine and monochloramine can be harmful to fish because they directly enter their bloodstream through the gills.
• Chlorine and monochloramine can also prevent the growth of beneficial bacteria that are necessary for healthy fish tanks.
• Chlorinated and chloraminated water can be safely used in aquariums by using products readily available from aquarium supply stores.
There is a wealth of additional information on the EPA’s web site if you still have questions about chloramines.
As for me, I have taken and plan to take no special precautions with regard to the PAWC water coming into my home. While I will certainly remain vigilant for any changes, I’ve done my research, and am ready to move past the chloramine debate.
Jun 18th
I had a chance to talk with a friend this afternoon, and found out that a gorgeous piece of Fairview Township farm land may soon fall victim to the developer’s bulldozer blade.
Allow me to preface this post with the fact that all I know is based on a single conversation with a single person. Regardless, it has such a ring of validity to it, and the friend is not a person on whom I would hang the label of “gossip” or “rumor monger.” In short, I place great stock in what he or she said.
So, now that I’ve established that from here on out in this post the rule of caveat emptor should apply, we can commence with the 411.
There is talk afoot that the Hempt property bordered by Limekiln Road, Green Lane Drive and the Yellow Breeches Creek may soon be the site of a 185-home development. According to my friend, the Lower Allen Township Authority has been contacted for the purpose of securing sewage capacity for 185 homes, which would be a necessary early step in developing the parcel.
This rings true because of the recent attempt to rezone land owned by the Hempts in Silver Spring Township. That effort has stalled at the township level because zoning will have to be changed to build out the land in the manner the developer desires.
In Fairview Township, though, the zoning on the land in question is Residential Single. Also, a cluster development is a permitted conditional use in that zoning district.
And while one and one make two and not 185, when I factor in the reclamation work Hempt Quarry is doing in Lower Allen on its western quarry, along with conversation at a previous LAT BOC meeting at which the idea of turning over the entire Hempt Quarry parcel in LAT was floated, suddenly a large development down the road in Fairview Township sounds very, very feasible.
Stay tuned for further developments on this one. It has all the hallmarks of an old fashioned donnybrook with local officials unable to stop a development permitted by current zoning ordinances, but one which is going to be passionately opposed by the folks next door.
Jun 18th
Earlier this year, I posted information about an art contest sponsored by Pennsylvania American Water Company.
So, while the chloramine issue rattles around the halls of the State Legislature – a body, I might add, which should instead be paying attention to how to balance our budget instead of this folderol – we have a winner to announce.
While no Lower Allen youngster won the contest, I would like to congratulate Spring-Ford fifth-grader Taylor Ruffo on her grand prize win. PAWC distributed Taylor’s art work on seed filled cards it sent across the Commonwealth.
May 14th
Courtesy of Fox43′s web site, here’s their story on last night’s meeting at Highland Elementary:
Not very well attended, and not a lot appeared to come of it other than residents having a chance to air their concerns.
Here’s The Patriot-News’ story about the same event.
May 11th
Just a quick post today about the state of financial affairs in the Republican primary for the 88th State House seat.
Financial records for candidates for state office are on line now with the Pennsylvania Department of State. No more schlepping to Carlisle or Harrisburg to muck around in the archives.
A quick search on Margie Stuski’s name reveals that the Republican – yes, she was a Democrat after she was a Republican – candidate has spent a sum total of $405 in her race to unseat incumbent Rep. Sheryl Delozier. Yes, $405.
Here’s Ms. Stuski’s report.
A similar search for Rep. Delozier, though, returns no results.
None. Nada. Nothing.
Searching on Rep. Delozier’s name in the 2008 cycle reveals a full set of campaign finance reports.
After 2008, though, there’s no reports searchable with Rep. Delozier’s name. Odd.
Rep. Delozier maintains a separate campaign web site paid for by the Friends of Sheryl Delozier. Look back at the 2008 reports, and you’ll see that is the name of her committee at that time.
The committee apparently still exists, but I can’t seem to find any campaign finance filings by them since Jan. 1, 2009.
Please show us the money, Rep. Delozier. Where are your campaign finance reports?
May 8th
In yet another interesting idea who’s time may or may not have come, I thought I’d see if I could cobble together a blog post about the stuff I’m reading during the week.
If you’re dropping by to check out the blog, you’re likely tech savvy enough to follow other blogs, maybe some RSS feeds, have a Facebook friend or 200, and may be trolling through Twitter. Well, it may not describe you, but it fits me to a “t”.
As I wade through all of that information several times a day, there are posts or tweets that either amuse me, cause me to pause, or warrant a deeper investigation later. When that happens, I star the item.
So, for what it may or may not be worth, here’s what’s risen out of my media clutter in the last week or so presented with either a helpful or caustic comment:
Articles & Posts
Tweets
That’s all for this week.
Check back for more updates later, and don’t forget to keep up on your Lower Allen news on my Pennlive blog.
Apr 24th
I have become a fan of TED lectures through seeing a talk by Daniel Pink at work. The lectures cover many different topics ranging from science to marketing.
You can follow the site via Facebook, also, which is where I stumbled on an excellent short talk presented by Omar Ahmad, “an internet infrastructure maven and a member of the City Council for San Carlos, California.”
I have a lot of time trying to engage the public in Lower Allen Township via this blog, emails, tweets, Facebook updates, etc. Regardless, Mr. Ahmad’s approach struck me as being so straightforward and direct that it would likely be effective. Certainly, the majority of elected officials with whom I am acquainted would be sure to at least take notice of a plea made in this manner, if not to respond exactly as Mr. Ahmad says they will.
It’s worth a few minutes of your time.
Apr 10th
A story on A3 of today’s Patriot-News spurred some deeper thought this morning as I enjoyed a fantastic – if I do say so myself – roasted tomato and onion omelet with cheese. Written by Monica Von Dobeneck, the article dips a toe into the question of whether scholastic athletes or their families should pay for the privilege of competing on school teams:
“Pay-to-play – which makes students pay a fee to participate in extracurricular activities – comes up often when school districts are struggling with their budgets. But it’s generally unpopular with parents, and for that reason, not many area schools have implemented the plan.
It came up again at Thursday’s West Shore School Board study session, when school directors asked the administration to come up with solutions to fill a multimillion dollar budget gap….”
Having had a hand in approving municipal budgets for the last four years, I started to wonder just how much of the West Shore School District’s (WSSD) budget is devoted to athletics. If we’re going to make Jimmy and Jane pay to suit up for Cedar Cliff and Red Land, it might be good to know how much of the district’s expenses are devoted to their uniforms, athletic fields, etc.
After a quick search, I wound up on the WSSD’s page devoted to information about its board of directors. Displayed prominently in the left sidebar are several sub-pages devoted to past, present and future budgets.
The answers are out there. All you have to do is look.
The documents presented for next year’s budget delve into how the budget is crafted, as well as what many of the budget categories comprise. They provide a glimpse into the coming budget crunch; a glimpse likely not for the faint of heart.
According to the Budget Update Fund Balance Analysis in the budget update provided on April 8, WSSD faces a possible $3,076,182 shortfall at the end of the current fiscal year. That shortfall would reduce the fund balance available at the beginning of the next fiscal year to $5,470,578, or less than 6% of projected expenses for the 2010-11 budget, a budget which may be crafted with a projected deficit from $2.8M to $4.2M.
In other words, the WSSD piggy bank – another way to think of its fund balance – could be almost empty even before the 2012 pension crunch comes crashing through its door. If that happens, paying to play is not going to be the only issue school funding issue worrying WSSD residents.
As far as my initial question regarding the proportion of the budget devoted to athletic activities, well, that isn’t real clear from the budget documents. The percentage may by something less than 1.26% if all athletic activities are contained in budget category 3200 (Student Activities), but they likely aren’t. I’ll ask a question of a friend next week and see if I can get an answer.
One thing which is clear, though, is the major cost driver in the budget; personnel expenses. No surprise there.
But when you look deeper at the first budget file and you drill down to page 15, you get the real breakdown, the one the state legislature has been loathe to address.
When comparing WSSD’s 2009-10 budget to the proposed 2010-11 budget, salaries are only projected to increase by 1.67%. While they comprise 56% of the budget, their change from one year to the next is in line with what you’d expect to see.
Look four lines further down, though, and you get to the heart of the matter.
Retirement expenses are projected to increase by 46.40%, or $1.4M, from this year to the next. And that’s just the beginning. Things really start to get interesting next year.
With revenues projected to fall by almost $330,000, do not expect tax rates to remain static unless somebody gets real in Harrisburg and solves this mess. The coming public pension tsunami will wash up on every shore, and the damage it wreaks to your wallet will be tangible.
But it doesn’t have to happen. While remedies have been proposed, no action has been taken.
When asked about the pension crisis recently, I opined that nothing is likely to be done until the eleventh hour so an as yet to be identified politico can claim white knight status. Is that too pessimistic an outlook, or do you think somebody in the PA Legislature may find the fortitude to act during an election year?
Sound off in the comments, or tweet me your opinion.
Regardless, I hope The Patriot-News’ decides to stop focusing on the sizzle of the WSSD budget process – kids paying to play – at the expense of examining the steak. The more light it shines on the pension crisis, the more likely something positive will happen.
Leave the kids alone. Focus on the fat cats instead.
To my mind, it’s time for a little tried and true afflicting of the comfortable.
Recent Comments